Cendri Health

How Much of Your Contract Are You Actually Collecting?

Behavioral health facilities collect roughly half of what their payer contracts already allow. Not because claims get denied — denial rates at our pilot facilities run 1.4% — but because nobody checks whether what was paid matches what was allowed. EHRs write notes. RCM tools track claims. Neither one compares the clinical record to the remittance, so an underpayment looks exactly like a payment.

Calculate your facility's exposure below.

Your Contract Gap

Adjust the fields below to see the gap between what your contract allows and what you actually collect.

Inpatient/residential

$

Median allowed per day of care, measured across 8,311 pilot claim lines

%

Industry avg for residential BH

%

Measured at a pilot facility. A healthy facility runs 95%.

Allowed by Contract

$4,304,719

Collected

$2,268,587

Gap Against Contract

$2,036,132

Modeled Recovery

$101,807

We price the contract gap at 5%, not at the gap itself. In our pilot's own remittance data, 85.1% of adjustment dollars are contractual obligation that is never collectable, 12.6% is patient responsibility, and 2.3% is payer-initiated. The pilot tells you your split before you chase anything.

What About Facilities With Contracted Rates?

Contracted rates set the ceiling — and nobody checks whether you hit it. The gap between allowed and collected is not a billing problem, it's a clinical-to-RCM disconnect. Cendri reconciles your documentation against what the payer actually remitted and classifies every dollar of the gap: contractual adjustment, patient responsibility, or payer-initiated. You see your split before you chase any of it.

Even in-network, you lose revenue to:

Underpayments vs. allowed

Payers remit below their own contracted amounts

Partial denials / days denied

Requested 14 days, authorized 7 — the gap is measured, not estimated

Never-billed claims

463 claims, $155,517 — payer field reads "unknown"

Expired filing windows

Process failure, catchable before submission

Documentation never received

Process failure, catchable before submission

Eligibility not met

Process failure, catchable before submission

The 30-day pilot measures the actual recovery on your claims — not industry averages.

Start the Pilot
From Our Pilot Facilities
52.7%
net collection against contracted allowed at a pilot facility
$84,881
preventable denials, coded and identified (133 claims)
24,276
claims baselined across two pilot facilities

Why Your Facility Loses Revenue You Should Have Collected

1

Two different denials, and only one of them is rare

Prior-authorization denials run 1.4% at our pilot facilities. Claim denials are separate and far more common: 501 of them closed with no recorded appeal outcome, and $84,881 across 133 claims were denied for pure process failures — expired filing windows, documentation never received, eligibility not met. But the largest gap isn't either one. It's underpayment: 52.7% net collection against contracted rates at a pilot facility, where a healthy facility runs 95%. A claim can be paid, recorded as paid, and still be wrong.

2

The Appeal Gap

11.5% of prior-authorization denials are appealed — most facilities don't have the staff time. (KFF analysis of CMS data, 2024)

3

The Win Rate You're Missing

When facilities do appeal, 80.7% of Medicare Advantage PA appeals are overturned — meaning the original denial was wrong. (KFF analysis of CMS data, 2024)

4

Preventable Denials

At one pilot facility, 133 claims and $84,881 were denied for process failures — expired filing windows, documentation never received, eligibility not met. Every one carries a reason code and is catchable before submission. The other pilot had 218 denials with no reason code at all — which is itself the finding.

Cendri's Clinical-to-RCM Reconciliation Engine

Cendri does not promise to recover every dollar. It bridges the gap between clinical documentation and revenue cycle — three specific, measurable things:

Reduce First-Pass Denials

Cendri uses 24,276 claims baselined across two pilot facilities, 8 payer-specific medical necessity templates, 5 ASAM level-of-care templates, and your facility's own approval/denial history to draft prior-auth letters that match each payer's documented preferences at the right level of care. Better first-pass authorization → fewer denials → less appeal work.

Make Appeals Faster & More Successful

When denials happen, Cendri auto-drafts appeal letters using the original denial reason + payer-specific overturn patterns from the outcome learning loop. Your team approves and sends instead of starting from scratch.

Learn Continuously

Every approval and denial sharpens the next letter. After 30 days of operational use, Cendri is calibrated to your specific payer mix and your facility's outcomes. The Save → Outcome → Appeal → Payer Intelligence loop is covered by our 8 patent-pending claims, priority date locked April 2026.

What We Don't Claim

We don't promise a specific dollar recovery without seeing your data. Here's what we will commit to in a pilot: a reconciled view of your collections against your own contracted allowed amounts, a classified list of every underpaid and unworked claim, measurable reduction in days-to-decision, and all AI endpoints included.

Typical Pilot Structure

PhaseDurationWhat Happens
Onboard1 weekEHR data import (CSV), payer rule import, baseline metrics captured
Calibrate1 weekAI learns your payers from real outcomes, first prior-auths drafted
Measure30 daysApproval-rate, days-to-decision, denial-rate deltas vs baseline
DecideAfter day 30Continue to multi-year contract or walk — no commitment. Your call

The 8 Payer Templates Shipped Today

Cendri ships with prior-auth and appeal templates pre-built for major payers across military, federal, state, and commercial channels, informed by 24,276 claims baselined across two pilot facilities:

Tricare (military health system)
Medicare (federal)
Medicaid (state-by-state variants)
UnitedHealthcare / Optum BH
Aetna
Blue Cross Blue Shield (multi-region)
Cigna
VA Community Care

Each template incorporates payer-specific medical-necessity language, ASAM-level documentation across all 5 levels of care (Detox, Residential, PHP, IOP, OP), and historical overturn patterns from the outcome baseline. 8 payers × 5 ASAM levels = 40 distinct authorization configurations.

Two Ways to Start

See It in 20 Minutes

Walk through the reconciliation workflow with a Cendri specialist using a simulated case from your typical payer mix.

Schedule Demo

Pilot at One Facility

30-day pilot at a single facility — no cost to you. We measure the contract gap and denial mix on your real claims. No commitment to continue until the data proves itself.

Talk to a Specialist

Frequently Asked Questions

Cendri Health

Contact Us

Quick Contact

Follow Us

The reconciliation layer between clinical documentation and revenue cycle — payer outcome intelligence, clinical-to-RCM reconciliation, ambient Scribe, multi-model risk stratification, and clinical co-pilot. Works on top of your existing EHR.

© 2026 Cendri Health LLC. All rights reserved.